Understanding the Databases

Terms of Use Agreement

In the past decade, major private equity firms that have promised to reduce their own climate impact have been quietly investing in fossil fuels, further propelling the climate crisis. The Private Equity Climate Risks project has developed databases of the energy companies and fossil fuel assets of 20 of the largest private equity firms in the world, compiling their energy companies and fossil fuel assets in easy-to-access databases, not available anywhere else. The Global Energy Company Tracker shows the energy holdings (companies) of the 20 private equity firms, and the Global Fossil Fuel Asset Tracker details the individual fossil fuel assets of the energy companies listed in the company tracker.

These datasets allow investors, policymakers, regulators, researchers, journalists, and the general public to investigate and better understand the role the private equity industry is playing in the continued production and distribution of fossil fuels.

The private equity firms included in the databases are: Apollo Global Management, ArcLight, Ares Management, BlackRock Private Equity Partners (Global Infrastructure Partners), Blackstone, Brookfield (Oaktree), Carlyle (NGP), EIG Global Energy Partners, EnCap Investments (Encap Flatrock Midstream), Global Infrastructure Partners, Energy Capital Partners (owned by Bridgepoint), EQT, I Squared Capital, IFM Investors, Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, KKR, Macquarie Asset Management, Quantum Capital Group, Stonepeak Infrastructure Partners, TPG Inc., and Warburg Pincus.

The Global Energy Company Tracker 

The Global Fossil Fuel Asset Tracker

Private Equity and the Climate Crisis 

Since 2010, private equity firms have invested over one trillion dollars in energy projects and are now under scrutiny for the environmental and climate impact of their investments,[1] which face less regulatory oversight than those of other financial actors, like big banks.

The adverse effects of climate change and environmental degradation, such as more frequent and more extreme droughts, prolonged heat waves, flooding, wildfires, long-term health impacts,[2] and large-scale displacement of people,[3] are already here.[4] To curtail the impacts of unabated greenhouse gas emissions, limit average global temperature rise to below 1.5 degrees Celsius,[5] and reduce air and water pollution, it is imperative to cut the financing flows that enable the extraction, transport, use of, and dependence on fossil fuels. The investment practices of private equity firms must be shifted for these efforts to succeed.

The Private Equity Model Creates an Accountability Vacuum for Community and Climate Harms

Private equity firms are investment companies that raise money from wealthy individuals and institutional investors—such as pension funds or university endowments—to create funds with which private equity firms purchase companies, real estate, natural resources, and other assets.[6] Funds have a typical life span of seven to 10 years. During the first three to five years, the fund makes investments and during the balance, the investments are realized and returns are distributed to investors.[7]

Usually, these investments are accompanied by taking over board seats or management positions in the target portfolio company and running the firm. That’s why the PECR tallied every energy company in which a named private equity firm has made an investment—in this context, private equity firms are not passive investors.

Financially, private equity firms seek to rapidly extract profits out of these new acquisitions before selling them or taking them public.[8] Typically, private equity firms use large amounts of borrowed money to acquire a target company. The debt is then added on to the target company’s balance sheet and the private equity owners often impose a combination of extensive cost cuts, expensive fees, and excessive risk-taking to be able to service the debt while still aiming to generate profit over the course of their holding period,[9] typically five years.[10] Companies can end up bankrupt after a private equity firm has exited the investment.[11]

The industry’s lack of financial accountability is enabled by regulatory loopholes that allow private equity firms to bypass most disclosure requirements and to legally implement complex corporate structures that largely eliminate their liability for portfolio companies’ negligence, malpractice or even government fines and fees.[12

Private equity firms’ financial extraction, cost-cutting, and evasive practices pose unique risks for their portfolio companies along the fossil fuel supply chain, for those companies’ workers, and for the communities in their vicinity. Financial resources that should go towards capital improvements, maintenance, or retaining adequate levels of qualified staff have at times been siphoned to Wall Street investors, with disastrous consequences.[13] Private equity firms’ lack of investment and disregard of environmental regulations has led to oil spills and air pollution, worker injuries, and pollution from refineries and chemical plants that have spewed contaminants to neighboring communities.[14]

These business practices can intensify harm to low-income communities, communities of color, and Indigenous peoples worldwide. Black, immigrant, Indigenous and low-income communities in North America, alongside residents in other countries with a history of colonial rule, are especially at risk. These communities have long been subject to environmental injustices stemming from the location of polluting projects and extractive industries, and they are increasingly vulnerable to climate change.[15] Lack of access to affordable healthcare —exacerbated by the intersection of factors like gender, race, ethnicity, income level, and the history of dispossession and slavery—compounds the problem.[16]